My mother put my brother's share in trust & gave me absolute discretion with no mandatory distributions in his lifetime because she hated him and his lifestyle. He filed a disclaimer in order to force me to distribute money to his children. The trust agreement mandates distributions after his death to his kids as they reach age 30. A lawyer I consulted said it could've been invalidated if my brother would've disclaimed assets he already received, but he excluded them; he has no creditors to evade; there is no requirement for a disclaimer to be in accordance with the grantor's intent. He says I don't have a case. Is this true? It's a travesty of my mother's wishes. Is there any other basis to invalidate a disclaimer?
Answer
Legally, it seems your brother has done nothing wrong and assuming the disclaimer is valid under NJ law, the assets would pass as though he predeceased your mother. I would need to review the Will to know what that would be. I'm not sure how the disclaimer would make a 'travesty' of your mother's wishes. Once your brother disclaims, he gets nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment